Lexington Heights, Inc.

Board of Trustees Meeting

June 18, 2022

I. Call to Order

The meeting was called to order by Vice-President, Glady Stablein, at 9:01.

II. Trustees Present

Glady Stablein, Renee Jobbitt, Don McColman, Dottie Schulte, and Kurt Riese were present. Lynn Secord, Liz Alimpich, and Bob Alimpich were absent/excused.

III. Reading of June 4, 2022 Minutes

The Board silently read the minutes. Glady wanted to add Julie, Lynn, and Glady to page 4 for the parade and dinner. Glady motioned to accept the minutes with the correction. Dottie seconded. All approved. Motion passed. (20227)

IV. Treasurer’s Report

Treasurer, Diana Larsson, gave an oral and written report of our current financial status. The report was accepted as presented. Diana gave a statement on what she has so far on the Adkin’s lawsuit. The only cost so far is cost of the survey which is split between Adkins and the Association and some mailings. Dottie asked if we could get an estimate of attorney fees. Diana responded maybe next week.

V. Member Topics

Several members were present to present issues.

VI. Committee Team Reports







VII. Unfinished Business

VIII. New/Ongoing Business – Renee spoke of the election on July 23 from 11 AM to 3 PM. The children’s parade is on July 3 at 12:00 (noon). Diana is planning to mail the dues increase letter after August 20. Glady and Kurt looked at a fallen tree in the creek. Bob will have to look at it. Glady gave kudos to Kurt and Bob for organizing the Nymph tree cutting. Kurt is aggravated with the Lexington Heights Homeowners Association Facebook group. He wants Lexington Heights dropped from the name. Glady said we’d look into what’s legal. Kurt motioned to have Lexington Heights removed from the Facebook group. Diana seconded. Motion did not pass. Dottie asked if motion could be brought up again once looked into. Glady said yes.

IX. Trustee Comments and ConcernsGlady read a statement she had written concerning the Adkins’ lawsuit. Her comments are attached.

X. AdjournmentGlady motioned to adjourn. Diana seconded. Motion passed. (20228)





Upcoming Community Events

July 3 Children’s Parade 12:00

July 9 Board Mtg. @ 9:00 AM Absentee Voting 11 – 1:00 PM

July 23 Board Mtg. @ 9:00 AM Board Elections 11:00 – 3:00 Euchre 7:00 PM

August 6 Board Mtg. @ 9:00 AM

August 20 @ 10:00 AM General Meeting Euchre Night 7:00 PM

August 27 Corn Roast @ 1 – 4:00 PM

September 2 @ 6:00 PM Mystery Night

September 10 @ 9:00 AM Board Meeting

September 24 @ 9:00 AM Board Mtg. Spaghetti Dinner 6:00 PM

October 1 Chili Fest 6:00 PM
































Written by Glady Stablein:


The Board holds no ill will toward the Adkins.


This Board wants the matter with the Adkins to be settled; and it will be

in due time. When a lawsuit is filed, you are at the mercy of the Courts for

dates and hearings.


There have not been any nefarious actions on the part of the Board.

The Board has been responding to the lawsuit in a legal and calm manner working through the attorneys. There is no urgency.


I cannot understand the anger from a handful of residents who appear to want to keep things stirred up with bombastic claims that have no basis whatsoever, i.e., the house is about to fall into the creek, the Board gave Adkins permission to install a wall at the creek’s edge, they’ve actually seen the letter giving such permission. NO truth whatsoever.


Then there are those who say that because their cottage isn’t anywhere near the creek, they have no opinion on what happens at the creek.

However, the Board has the fiduciary responsibility to look out for all properties under the control of Lex Hi.


Why doesn’t the Board just give/sell him the property he needs? He doesn’t need any additional property to simply build a retainer wall.


Please - don’t let half-truths and rumors cause discord within our community.


Keep in mind:


The Board did NOT file the lawsuit.

The property in question is not in imminent danger of falling into the creek.

The only permission the Board granted was for Parker to cross Lex Hi property to access the Adkins’ property.

Adkins’ were never denied the right to build a wall on their own property

at any time.

4